Write to Congress

  • The bill has passed the House twice and come near to Senate approval by unanimous consent (UC) in prior sessions of Congress.  
  • In the 113th Congress, the bill was re-introduced in the Senate by Sens. John Hoeven (R-ND) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) as S. 1458.  In the House, Reps. Peter King (R-NY) and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) circulated the bill for cosponsors.
  • Re-introduction in the 114th (current) Congress is anticipated soon.

Help Us Secure Cosponsorship Commitments!

Example Letter to Congress 

(fill in the info in <brackets>, and feel free to modify!)

Dear <Senator or Representative>,

As a <constituent / supporter / friend>, I write to urge you to cosponsor the Daniel Webster Congressional Clerkship Act. 

This bipartisan bill would create in Congress a centralized law clerk program analogous to the judicial clerkship program for new law graduates in their apprenticeship years.  

This bill is about improving Congress’s constitutional standing and the legal profession’s understanding of legislation. 

Article I of the U.S. Constitution establishes Congress as the federal government’s “first branch” and the primary author of federal law.  Congress is also the branch most accountable to the people.  Of the three branches, however, Congress is by far the least influential on the constitutional perspective of the legal community that shapes public perceptions of the law, and interprets and implements the law Congress writes. 

One major reason for this long-term slide in Congress’s constitutional standing is that Congress is relatively inaccessible to new lawyers in their formative first years.  Congress alone among the three branches of government does not have an apprenticeship program designed for the legal profession’s future leaders, one that hires roughly a year in advance.  Congress hires lawyers ad hoc, usually at the last second.  In contrast, the annual flow of new lawyers into the apprenticeship programs of the courts and federal agencies has given the legal community a constantly renewed and formative on-the-job education in judicial and administrative lawmaking.  A centralized congressional clerkship program would enable the nation’s Legislative Branch to shape the views of the legal community’s future leaders, as well, and over time restore greater balance in professional backgrounds within the legal profession.

In addition to benefitting Congress over the long term, in the near term legislative law clerkships would benefit new lawyers.  Most law today is statutory, and regulations based in statutes.  Statutory interpretation is the bread and butter of legal practice at all levels of government, but is challenging due to the complexity of legislation and of the legislative process that produces it.  As legislative law clerks, new lawyers would learn-by-doing legislation, to the benefit of their clients and colleagues throughout their careers.

Congress would also gain in the near term.  Basic legal legislative work – statutory research, drafting, and analysis – often gets short shrift in busy Capitol Hill offices.  Congress would benefit from the legislative focus and legal training of these one-year temporary hires.

The Daniel Webster Congressional Clerkship Act would establish 12 year-long law clerk positions, equally divided between the chambers and caucuses.  The program would offer pay competitive with apprenticeships in the courts.  The program need not spend any new money.  

To train a new generation of lawyers who will more fully understand Congress's constitutional role, the legislative process, and the U.S. Code it produces, I ask that you cosponsor this bill (S. 1458 in the last Congress) and speed its passage.  I look forward to hearing from you on this matter.

Thank you for your time and service to our nation. 

<Your Name>
<Your Address>